God's Army to take over our Government? Meet NAR (yes it's scary)

New Apolistic Reformation (NAR)

Everyone in this country should take a minute to research the intense faction of 30% of the MAGA minions called the New Apolistic Reformation (NAR). NAR is a nationwide collective of Evangelical Megahurches. NAR fully believes that they are God’s Army mandated to save the whole world from Satan and the demons that possess all the evil people - liberals, muslims, all other religions besides Christianity, LGBTQ+, people of color, although they're keeping that somewhat quiet because right now they’re recruiting a ton of Latinos and Blacks through their Megachurches that suck people in by providing all sorts of social services.They're kind of a lot like Hamas in Palestine and the Taliban in Afghanistan.They are the psychos that accuse people of witchcraft, think anyone different then them is a demon, and the ones who are fueling the recruitment of the violent militias.

They do not adhere to regular Christian theology. They don't remind me of Jesus at all, but they fully adhere to the Bible above the Constitution. They believe that the Church is supposed to control the government, not the other way around. They know nothing about what our Forefathers intended when they created the US Constitution. That is why they want to mostly disband the public school system so they can control everything their children learn. MAGA, formerly called The Tea Party, was originally started by David Koch, of the multi-billionaire Koch (pronounced ‘Coke’) brothers’, 501(c)3 called Americans for Prosperity. It’s basically a political party disguised as religion. They don’t study theology, they only work towards taking over the world. They have way more assault weapons than the local police forces and I guess they've infiltrated a lot of their local police forces and the National Guard in their towns and suburbs and counties. I am not entirely confident that we are prepared to put down the well-coordinated nationwide violent revolt that I’m hearing about. C

The Rev. John McCloskey -  The priest, who operates out of Washington’s Catholic Information Center

The Catholic Church’s K Street lobbyist.

Opus Dei -conservative Catholic society

“Opus Dei is the most controversial movement in the Catholic Church today.” It’s fiercely evangelical and fully devoted to the pope and the Catholic hierarchy. It’s also a powerful force within the Vatican. 

“Opus Dei is the most controversial movement in the Catholic Church today.” It’s fiercely evangelical and fully devoted to the pope and the Catholic hierarchy. It’s also a powerful force within the Vatican. 

It’s a two-pronged strategy: Bring in conservative evangelical Protestants like Brownback while at the same time casting out liberal Catholics of all stripes. McCloskey is the anti-Garry Wills, telling American Catholics who dissent from some church teachings why you aren’t a Catholic. “A liberal Catholic is oxymoronic,” he says. “The definition of a person who disagrees with what the Catholic Church is teaching is called a Protestant.” The Catholic Information Center, which McCloskey calls D.C.’s “downtown center of evangelization” for Catholicism, with a top-down strategy to transform the culture, too. He wants to turn Blue America into Red. As McCloskey wrote in an essay last year for Catholic World Report, “[I]n the first several centuries of Christianity the Gospel was most successfully preached not to the poor and the outcasts, but rather to the prosperous middle classes and educated upper classes in the cities.”

But McCloskey says that Catholics must “assent wholeheartedly” to each and every one of the church’s teachings, regardless of how theologians rank their importance. “A good Catholic isn’t worried about going deep into these theological levels,” he says. “You say, ‘I believe.’ ” It’s an anti-intellectual approach

Web site, McCloskey’s Perspectives. He describes the period after Vatican II as a “generally unfortunate period for our country and our Church,” calls coeducation a “failure,” and notes the “particular needs of the complementary yet quite different sexes.”